MATT DRUDGE // DRUDGE REPORT 2002�
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SAT SEPT 14, 2002 12:01:37 ET XXXXX
WELCH DEFENDS: 'I SACRIFICED MILLIONS'
The jets? The seats? The meals? The maids?
"I sacrificed millions of dollars," John F. Welch Jr., the former chief executive of GENERAL ELECTRIC, offers in defense on PBS this weekend in his first interview since divorce court papers alleged a retirement lifestyle fit for a lord.
In 1996 ..."the [GE] board came to me and offered me tens of millions of
dollars in a package, in a retention package," Welch said. "Instead I
said I didn't need that. What I wanted was to continue to use the plane,
have use of GE's plane, and have use of GE's apartment ... I've never
made a decision in my life that wasn't in the best interest of the GE
employees and the shareholders," Welch explains on PBS's Wall $treet Week with FORTUNE.
Along with access to corporate aircraft, documents filed by his wife, Jane, describe Welch's use of a Manhattan apartment owned by G.E., floor-level seats to the New York Knicks, courtside seats at the U.S. Open, satellite TV at his four homes and all the costs associated with the New York apartment, from wine and food to laundry, toiletries and newspapers. The privileges, down to dining bills, have continued even in retirement!
G.E. even pays for security personnel when the Welches travel abroad.
G.E. pays for V.I.P seating at Wimbledon, a box at the Metropolitan Opera, a box at Red Sox games, a box at Yankee games, four country club fees, security services in all four homes and limousine services while traveling.
Not to mention someone to the hold the umbrella?
GEOFF COLVIN: The most celebrated and successful CEO of the 20th
century is Jack Welch, who ran General Electric from 1980 to 2001.
During his tenure, GE's market value increased by about $400 billion, a
record no other CEO has ever approached. For the past seven days, he has
been in the headlines for another reason, as a filing in his divorce
case has revealed details of his retirement perks that have upset and
even outraged a lot of people.
Jack, welcome. The news of the past week has sparked some remarkable
responses. A couple -- Nell Minow at the Corporate Library says it is
appalling that one of the wealthiest men in America cannot write a check
for his own Knicks tickets. The Wall Street Journal in an editorial said
his contribution will be tarnished by the public airing of a retirement
package that makes him seem greedy. At this program we've received a lot
of e-mail from viewers, much of it angry. What do you say in response to
these people?
WELCH: Well, Geoff, when I agreed to come on this show in August from
the beach in Nantucket, I didn't know I'd be on at the end of the week
that I got more publicity than I got anytime I was ever CEO of GE during
21 years. And so it's rather alarming, and of course disturbing, that
private divorce filings, a private life and divorce filings can be filed
by one side that, you know it put things in a certain light representing
a part of the case. The facts are I've never not paid for a personal
meal. I don't ever cook. I, as far as tickets are concerned, Geoff, NBC
and GE have had boxes before Jack Welch became chairman. I rarely if
ever use them. And the anecdote I'd like to tell is that the Red Sox are
my favorite team. They've had 162 home games in the last two years. I've
been to one in the GE box. Other than that, they've been GE employees
and customers for 161 others, along with the day I was there. So I mean
these things do get, they are sensational, and it's unfortunate.
COLVIN: Well, just to get to the specifics, in case anybody doesn't
know, the GE proxy statement has said for years that in retirement you
would get certain things. You would get the use of a plane, chauffeured
car, the apartment in New York, financial planning. Now in this filing
there were all these other revelations, asserting that you would get all
these boxes at the Knicks and Wimbledon and so forth, flowers, food,
wine. That's largely untrue?
WELCH: Largely untrue. I mean do I have access to a seat, Geoff? Yeah.
Do I use it? I have access like many employees do. I mean I don't have
a, there's no personal ticket for Jack Welch.
COLVIN: In other words, these are GE company things and NBC company
things.
WELCH: GE company things and NBC company things. But I think the more
important thing that I'd like to put in perspective about this thing is
I didn't get a retirement package. I didn't have the party. I didn't
walk to the podium. They didn't give me a watch and an envelope and say,
ANice job, Jack. Here's your retirement package.@ In 1996, GE was doing
well. I was 61 years old. I just came off quintriple bypass. Every GE
chairman before me had retired at 62 and 63, my two predecessor in
particular. The GE board liked the succession plan we had put in place.
I was in the media for being offered this and being offered that. Of
course my heart was with GE and most people knew I'd go there. The only
alternative was early retirement. And the board came to me and offered
me tens of millions of dollars in a package, a retention package, in a
contract, contracts like you have, contracts like baseball players have,
contracts like stars at NBC the network used to have, a four-year
contract, and a signing bonus, to stay with GE, non-compete, and stay
with them in retirement.
COLVIN: And the signing bonus part was the tens of millions of dollars?
WELCH: Yes. And instead I said I didn't need that. What I wanted was to
continue to use the plane, have use of GE's plane, and have use of GE's
apartment, pay imputed income as the rules say, but use it on that
basis. Now, you know, these things, I've never made a decision in my
life that wasn't in the best interest of the GE employees and the
shareholders. In this particular deal, I sacrificed millions of dollars,
not that I am some generous sacrifice. I'd prefer to have what I had.
But it was an employment contract. I fulfilled my obligations. GE did
fantastically. Increased market cap $250 billion over the time frame,
became number one market cap in the world, most admired global company
for five years in a row. I gave it all I had, created a lot of CEOs, a
3M CEO, a Home Depot CEO, a Honeywell CEO B Dave Cote B and GE got a CEO
in Jeff Immelt that we're so proud of we could burst. So I did my job,
and in the end I got the in-kind benefits, rather than the cash, of
these things.
COLVIN: And you're saying that those benefits actually cost GE less than
what the board was offering.
WELCH: A fraction, Geoff. Not a little bit, a fraction.
COLVIN: And so here we are in this situation where it seems to be coming
back to the company, hurting it. How do you feel?
WELCH: I hate it. Geoff, I hate it. I've never in my life got up and
gone to work without the employees and the shareholders uppermost in my
mind. And I get a divorce, you know, my wife and I used to sit around
and say, how do people get in these skirmishes publicly? I'd like to ask
the question, how do you get out of them? That's the real question. I
mean in the end this is about a divorce that has highlighted something
in times that have changed, Geoff.
COLVIN: Exactly. Times have changed. I mean this is obviously a painful
situation for you. Do you think about doing anything about it?
WELCH: Geoff, I literally, as I said before, there isn't a decision I
make that isn't in the best interest of the shareholders and the
employees. But you've got to understand, I had an employment contract.
This was an employment contract, not a retirement contract. It gets
lumped into this gold watch, going out the door thing. And I gave it my
all, and all these things happened with the team I had. We had a team
that delivered, as you outlined in the opening of the show, fantastic
results. So this is a complex discussion and one that I'm giving
everything I've got to the company and in return I fulfilled my
obligations and the company fulfilled theirs.
COLVIN: Right. So you're thinking about sticking with it.
WELCH: Geoff, I think that's not, when I came on this show in August, I
didn't intend to talk about this. My basic position is we did a hell of
a job as a team, and we never one day did anything that would hurt the
employees or the shareholders. And I will continue in the next ten
years, if I'm alive, to do the exact same thing.
COLVIN: Let me ask you about some of the larger issues in corporate
America. We're in this extraordinary time now. There was a speech given
just the day before yesterday, September 11th as it happened, by William
McDonough, CEO of the New York Fed, about pay. He said the policy of
vastly increasing executive compensation was terribly bad social policy
and perhaps even bad morals, I can find nothing in economic theory that
justifies this development. Do you agree?
WELCH: Bill McDonough is a terrific fellow. He's done a great job
running the New York Fed. We're also in a capitalistic society. Do
shortstops over here deserve that much? Do anchors on television deserve
that much? Free markets aren't perfect. Capitalism isn't perfect. But
it's the best system we have. Supply and demand is critical. Today, for
example, in spite of all these things, as companies get in trouble, they
need good leadership. And they have to take somebody from company X and
move them to company Y to get that.
COLVIN: And it costs money.
WELCH: It costs money. Now I'm not, no one can justify on an absolute
basis a number for anybody. Is a star worth that much for a movie or
worth this much? The capitalistic system has its flaws, but it's the
best system I know.
COLVIN: Let's talk about another aspect, which is corporate governance.
Lots of talk about reform, independent chairmen. What do you think's a
good idea and what's bad?
WELCH: Geoff, I think the major issue here is let's watch out for
unintended consequences.
COLVIN: Meaning?
WELCH: Meaning that we put a million dollar cap in on salaries, so
people went to options, markets took off, people made a lot of money. We
wanted to align the interests of both at that time, okay? The
independent director issue worries me to death, because what do you want
out of a director? You want intelligence, common sense, independence,
the willingness to speak out. If you get people that the compensation of
the board, their compensation on the board is critical, I think they're
less likely to. No offense to faculty members or foundation heads, but
the income from a board is more significant to them than a wealthy
person who might have a one percent conflict.
COLVIN: We're going to have to close it up, Jack. I would love to talk
more about this. The fact is, our time is up.
WELCH: Thanks for having me here.
COLVIN: It's a pleasure to have you here.
WELCH: I love talking to you.
COLVIN: Thanks so much.
XX
END
-----------------------------------------------------------
Filed By Matt Drudge
Reports are moved when circumstances warrant
http://www.drudgereportArchives.com for updates
(c)DRUDGE REPORT 2002
Not for reproduction without permission of the author
|
|