AL GORE DELIVERS REMARKS AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY ON PRESIDENT
BUSH'S IRAQ POLICY
Thu Aug 07 2003 11:48:22 ET
Thank you. It's great to be here and I appreciate your
presence. Thank you so much for being here and for what you do on a
regular basis.
OK.
I want to especially thank MoveOn.org for sponsoring this event
and NYU for letting us use this beautiful facility and the NYU College Democrats for co-hosting it, cosponsoring it. I appreciate it very much.
Thank you, Michael Phillips (ph) and Eli Pariser (ph).
A special thanks to my former colleague John Brademas (ph).
I appreciate your kind words and Tipper and I are delighted to
be with you today.
Some of you may remember that the last time I talked formally on the topics that we're here to talk about today was a little less than a year ago in San Francisco, when I argued that the president's case for urgent and unilateral preemptive war in Iraq was less than convincing and needed to be challenged more effectively by the Congress.
In light of developments since then, you might assume that my purpose today is to revisit the manner in which we were led into war, and to some extent that will be the case, but only as part of a larger theme that I feel very strongly needs to be explored on an urgent basis.
The direction in which our nation is being led now is deeply troubling to me, not only in Iraq, but also here at home, on economic policy, social policy and environmental policy.
Millions of Americans now share a feeling that something pretty basic has gone wrong in our country and that some important American values are being placed at risk. And they want to set it right.
The way we went to war in Iraq illustrates this larger problem. Normally, we Americans lay the facts on the table and talk through the choices before us and make a decision. But that didn't really happen with this war, not the way it should have.
MORE
The Drudge Report does not own, operate or maintain DrudgeReportArchives.com and is not responsible for it in any way.